.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

iphone 4 covers marc jacobs

iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. Marc By Marc Jacobs Jumble
  • Marc By Marc Jacobs Jumble



  • Piggie
    Apr 23, 06:29 PM
    What was the point in bringing retina display to the iPhone? :)
    Same thing I guess...
    For one I want it, it is very kind on the eyes...

    Yes, because the iPhone was low res for a device you hold up to your nose and a typical consumer, which is what Apple design for, could easily see the pixels.

    I am wondering how many typical consumers, when viewing at the distance you would view, say a 24" monitor, can make out individual pixels.
    I do know Apple's font smoothing is a little, ummmm, shall we say, different to what Microsoft do, so perhaps typefaces do look more jaggy on a Mac than they do on a PC ?





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. Iphone+4+covers+south+
  • Iphone+4+covers+south+



  • daneoni
    Mar 31, 05:35 AM
    I was sharing this because I found it interesting, its supposed to be just 384MB shared. Just thinking if Lion enables more memory shared??:rolleyes:

    No it's doesn't. Snow Leopard also reports 512MB





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. NEW Marc By Marc Jacobs Hearts
  • NEW Marc By Marc Jacobs Hearts



  • Al Coholic
    Apr 7, 12:48 PM
    I see people still don�t understand what a monopoly is.And I see people are still taking the word monopoly used here too literally.

    Yeah, we know what a real monopoly is. Thanks.

    And here in the U.S. It generally starts with a company getting too much of the market and stifling out the competition. That's why there's the FTC.





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. Marc Jacobs#39; newest fragrance
  • Marc Jacobs#39; newest fragrance



  • paolo-
    Apr 9, 09:49 PM
    So if the parentheses are solved first why not just put them in front? Why go through all the semantics? Do scientists purposely make it this hard when solving equations?
    No, they usually write it using specialized program so you would clearly know if it's

    48
    2 * (9+3)

    or

    ____48___
    2*(9+3)

    But really, if you see this as 48�2(9+3), I think it becomes much more clearer. Most people aren't used to see / used as a division mark other than when using two lines, not used as a simple replacement as it is for computer. But yes they wouldn't go through the trouble of rewriting an equation just to make the order of operation simpler, as that is quite easy when you work with math everyday. But they do tidy up their equations so the intent should become clear. I mean, you could type verbally an equation, this is just the equivalent to punctuation, you put a point and a capital letter to start a new sentence.

    This question is purely semantics. But scientists tend to write for other scientists who have no trouble saying this is 288. But most profs I've had hate answering questions over email simply because writing equations with regular characters is crap.





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. iphone 4 covers uk.
  • iphone 4 covers uk.



  • Number 41
    Apr 26, 02:36 PM
    Mac is still a success nonetheless...

    Will be the same for the iPhone. Apple is happy with 2 models on 2 providers in the USA...

    Mac still doesn't have the software selection of Windows. Mac succeeds in spite of it's lack of developers because owning a Mac became "cool" at some point in the past 15 years. Microsoft shooting themselves in the head with Vista helped as well.

    Can the iPhone succeed when devs start to divert resources to Android development? Will the "cool" factor of owning an iPhone save it when the next "Angry Birds" type game is only available on Android? Or when major corporations develop Apps for their employees that require them to own Android phones (as happened with DOS/Windows back in the 80s and 90s)?

    Apple is happy now because they're making money. The gravy train will end when the balance reaches a tipping point -- as the PC market did -- where it simply isn't profitable to divert resources away from the majority market share to develop for the minority market share.





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. cover for the iPhone 4.
  • cover for the iPhone 4.



  • MacNut
    May 3, 06:13 PM
    Our highway exits are distanced usually by a mile. Changing the system would really mess that up unless we reconstruct all the exit ramps.





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. acting perhaps,
  • acting perhaps,



  • ElGringo
    Aug 7, 04:01 PM
    You know, I bought a dual core 2.0 G5 PowerMac a bit back for the ability to expand as needed. Since then I have added a second hard drive and NOT ONE PCIe card. Why? Because NO ONE out there makes a PCIe USB expansion card that is compatible with Deep Sleep Mode.

    Maybe the new Mac Pro's will usher in some better options in this area. I don't want hubs and the subsequent extra wall warts that go with it. I want more USB prots, not more wall warts.

    How long has PCIe been around in the PowerMac's and now Mac Pro's and there still isn't a solution for this????

    Anyway, a bit of a sidetrack, but the new Mac Pro's do look sweet!!





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. marc jacobs transformed
  • marc jacobs transformed



  • ChickenSwartz
    Aug 2, 03:28 PM
    This is a DEVELOPERS' conference!! Steve usually announces something on ONE new/updated product. You guys who are "predicting" that Apple will update everything in the lineup are asking for a let down.

    ONE new thing (Mac Pro) will be announced -- speed bumps and other updates usually happen 2-4 weeks AFTER the Developers' Conference. iMacs and MacBook Pros might get bumped in early September but that's it.


    I think "one" new thing will be the Core 2 Duo. This is the chip developers want in their computers: Mac Pro and MacBook Pro. I think it will be introduced in the iMac as the "Oh by the way, I have been using one during this Leopard preview" because it seems Steve likes to do that.

    With all the talk that has been going on about performance/watt (the reason Mac switched to Intel) the new Merom chip will news worth a Keynote spot.





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. Marc By Marc Jacobs Jumble
  • Marc By Marc Jacobs Jumble



  • gruvdone
    Apr 26, 04:02 PM
    I love that argument - who told Apple to only make 1 phone? Nobody it was their decision. This is PC vs Mac all over again - history repeating itself.

    That's a narrow and erroneous view. Are there some parallels? Sure. There are however some important differences.

    First, market share is not anywhere near as important as revenue share. Apple is absolutely trouncing Google and everyone else in this area.

    Second, developers are not making any money on Android, as it's user base appears to be comprised of spend-thrifts. It doesn't matter how many people you have using the platform, if developers can't sell applications that well then the lure isn't as strong. Combine that with the exceedingly frustrating fragmentation and inconsistent experience from device to device that makes the task of even writing an Android application that much harder, and it is less appealing still. Will that slow Android down? No, as there will always be customers for the Wal-Mart of mobile operating systems. It does, however limit them as any sort of real 'threat'.

    Third, let us not forget that absolute whoring out of hardware at 2 or even 3 for 1 deals is a huge factor in this surge in usage. It's quite easy to inflate your numbers when you hand stuff out for free. Again, in reference to my previous point, they really aren't doing the platform any favors long term, as it will bring down the revenue curve.

    Fourth, these numbers are for the US only. The worldwide picture is very different.

    I can't wait to see how Steve Jobs spins this somehow at WWDC - my guess is he'll throw iPod Touches and iPads into their numbers so it doesn't look as horrible as the Nielsen chart shows.

    Why wouldn't he? iPod touch and iPad run the exact same mobile OS. Just because there is no real competition to either of these devices in the Android space, doesn't devalue their presence. Truthfully, I always take a skeptical stance on the motives of any 'report' on mobile OS usage which conveniently leaves these devices out. Smacks of fomenting, it does.


    Next up...tablets :D

    Yeah, cause that's been working out really well for them so far. Look, you can have your irrational "I hate Apple cause they are cool, and I rail against anything popular, cause I'M NOT A CONFORMIST!!!" BS all you want to. It doesn't change for one second the fact that Apple innovates, and everyone else imitates and tries to make all the money they can on the back of Apple's IP.

    Personally, I'd say enjoy it while you can. Apple has been establishing precedent with its patent litigation against smaller targets. Now they are taking on a medium-sized one in Samsung, and once that victory is complete, Google will be the next to fall.

    Look, I'm all for good old fashioned competition. But somebody besides Apple has to step up to the plate and actually create something. This whole me-too copycat crap is wearing thin.





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. for iPhone 3G/3GS S$78
  • for iPhone 3G/3GS S$78



  • ITASOR
    Jul 21, 02:47 PM
    With the more frequent processor changes/speed upgrades that goes along with switching to Intel, what is Apple going to do with all the "left overs" of old versions of products?





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. Black silicone iPhone case with embossed jumbled letter motif that fits an iPhone 3G. Marc by Marc Jacobs case has curved edges and simply slips on.
  • Black silicone iPhone case with embossed jumbled letter motif that fits an iPhone 3G. Marc by Marc Jacobs case has curved edges and simply slips on.



  • zero2dash
    Aug 7, 03:30 PM
    I'm excited but disappointed at the same time.

    It's nice to see some of the things they're incorporating into Leopard, and it's great to finally see a physical MacPro and read a spec sheet. You get a lot of processing power for the money, no doubt.

    On the flipside -
    the base video card is pretty meh. Additional HD options are ridiculously limited; you can only add 500g ones (no 250) for 2nd/3rd/4th HD. Base price on the dual 2.6 is..ok I guess. I join many others when I say I was hoping for lower cost but we'll see if they deliver a high end iMac with a Core 2 in the next few months.

    Congrats to all the early adopters; I'm envious. :)
    But I think the waiting game is best, even though it sucks. Then again I don't have the necessary funds so it's excusable. I'll be waiting til next year around the time Leopard launches I think and then I'll buy...mmm something. :D (Depends on what these are going for and also if we see any Core 2 iMacs.)

    All in all though, way to go Apple...you've got yourself another customer. I can't wait to be able to use some of the new features in Leopard.





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. st Iphone+4+covers+south+
  • st Iphone+4+covers+south+



  • CFreymarc
    Mar 30, 12:27 AM
    Yeah :( all the seismologists had no idea an earthquake this big could be triggered by LiPo batteries.

    Then there is the business plan / conspiracy theory that this was caused above the Sichuan epicenter by the Chinese reverse engineering of the American HAARP.





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. with Marc Jacobs, Perrier,
  • with Marc Jacobs, Perrier,



  • Vic320
    Apr 25, 09:18 AM
    This whole thing is stupid. Of course the iPhone will track what cell towers and wi-fi access points are around it. It needs this information to be able to make phone calls and access the internet. It makes sense that this info be stored so that it does not have to gather in info every time (basic cacheing). What Apple did not anticipate was that someone would find this database and would start screaming about an "invasion of privacy". It is probably something that Apple could have foreseen and they should have encrypted this info, but until someone proves that this info is actually being transmitted back to Apple, it's just a bunch of crap.





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. Iphone+4+covers+kate+spade
  • Iphone+4+covers+kate+spade



  • nuckinfutz
    May 7, 10:53 AM
    We all remember the internal meeting Jobs held discussing how Google was in effect 'declaring war on Apple' by invading their "mobile" turf; what if this is Apple reciprocating. Offering similar options to Gmail for free and attempting to complement MobileMe with iAds in an attempt to unthrone Google. With the high hopes Apple has for iAds (as suggested by the rumors regarding the high developer pricing of iAds) it does make sense, and in the very least, try to hurt Google. Another intriguing question is: would Apple loyalists prefer Apple service over another as long as the quality is acceptable (perhaps even if the quality was less than the options, at first).

    Apple has been doing this stuff since .mac so they've been on the turf for a while. iAds is not gonna be a part of the equation. Apple's building a huge datacenter in NC and with free Mobileme it gives developers a "no brainer" incentive to use Mobileme for their OTA sync. Wifi sync does nothing but irritate the user IMO.

    This isn't about hurting Google this is about taking the next leap forward in computing by melding cloud services with mobile and desktop computing

    Why not just make it a $20 product instead of giving it away for no profit?

    Because Free always has better uptake as witnessed by the legions of people that let Google scrape their emails and other data to provide targeted ads. These people actually perceive this as being "Free" when in fact you're letting Google profit handsomely off your data.





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. Marc Jacobs, Eliot Spitzer,
  • Marc Jacobs, Eliot Spitzer,



  • ten-oak-druid
    Apr 25, 10:40 AM
    Steve:

    You may not track anyone. But you can. We'd like to know you cannot.

    Please address that issue.

    Thanks





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. Now Marc Jacobs himself,
  • Now Marc Jacobs himself,



  • emotion
    Nov 25, 05:11 AM
    I am positive that Apple will bring a twist into the mobile telephony market, something revolutionary nobody could think that it will work.

    And in 2 years from now everybody will state: Yes, Apple did it again.

    I bet they do the following:

    - Follow the KISS (Keep it stupit simple) concept and build on there current iPOD success!

    The new iPhone will be a WIFI iPOD with Skype (or something alike) build in. A high quality camera and Bluetooth Stereo Wireless will complete the hardware.
    The software will allow "on the go" chat, blogging, videocasts, RSS and a mobile safari browser.

    Strategy: Replace the need for an iPOD�s and provide the best personal communication tool

    - Eliminate traditional phone contracts with MobilePhone operators.

    Apple will aquire "FON" and build the largest hotspot community in the world where every iPhone user can communicate for free.



    Y'know as far fetched as some might say a lot of that is there's something that makes a lot of sense there too.

    If so I'm not surprised Steve keeps seaying that he has something cool coming soon in interviews!





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. Marc By Marc Jacobs Jumble
  • Marc By Marc Jacobs Jumble



  • dentaldoc
    Apr 26, 03:53 PM
    It doesn't take a genius to predict that when proprietary OS, making essentially one model of phone, is compared to essentially the rest of the world, that the open OS, having perhaps 30 companies manufacturing perhaps 50 or so models of phone at any time, that they will garner a bigger market share.

    Apple couldn't get enough parts to compete with 30 companies if they tried. They don't want to. Apple is not trying for world dominance. They are trying for perfection. Just as there are more Ford Pintos in the world than Bentleys. Who cares.

    So, in response to this "amazing" statistic, I say, SO WHAT!





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. Again Blackberry, iPhone has
  • Again Blackberry, iPhone has



  • cooltop
    Jan 28, 05:39 PM
    I purchased the TOMTOM app early on and paid $99 for it. One week later, I found it posted in the App Store for $49.99 and today, a couple of weeks after that, the price is $59.99. I have searched the App Store site, iTunes Store AND the Apple site and do not understand how to find a Customer Service Link to ask about a refund for the difference in price. Does anyone know how to reach Customer Service for the APP Store? Thanks in advance...





    iphone 4 covers marc jacobs. Latest iphone 4 Cover Case LV
  • Latest iphone 4 Cover Case LV



  • miloblithe
    Aug 7, 02:01 PM
    For those of you hoping for a mid-range tower, you're looking at it. Take the processor down from dual 2.66Ghz to dual 2.0 and the HD down from 250GB to 160, and you're looking at a $2124 machine.

    I sincerely doubt Apple will introduce any new model to its current lineup of mini/pro, macbook/macbook pro. Your best hope is a supermini.





    PlipPlop
    May 6, 06:27 AM
    Wouldn't a new CPU have to be much faster than the equivalent Intel chip to make it worthwhile? Not just equivalent. Wouldn't it have to be able to run previous generation software in emulation for a period of years.

    Yes, Arm would have to make significant performance increases. You would need a faster ARM processor than Intel ones if you want to emulate them. So in a year will Arm have a desktop cpu of emulating Intel's current sandybridge processors at a decent speed. I doubt it very much.





    ravenvii
    Jul 29, 09:00 PM
    If they somehow include a full qwerty thumb keyboard, this sleek and sexy phone is mine.





    2992
    Apr 20, 12:42 AM
    good to know it'll be Sept update, but... too long to wait, and iP4 is already old. Samsung G S2, here I come! :)





    ChickenSwartz
    Sep 15, 07:23 PM
    the only real fiasco they've had was that whole ipod video thing in march

    Looks like Apple made them get rid of all the pictures fake or not.





    Eidorian
    Mar 29, 02:38 PM
    Why in limbo? The "phone part" of the Iphone is widely acknowledged to be craptastic.True enough, I am still in search of a mobile internet device with a camera. The iPad 3G comes close except in price, size, and the mediocre camera.

    I am not willing to frivolously spend money on such an endeavor just to return it to the store. I already feel guilty enough about my many product returns to the point where I believe my card number is just shy of being blacklisted. Thank god for cash.

    I have a good inner circle of friends but our jobs and relationships are really killing what free time we have to game. That limits my desire to an Alienware M11x to have something portable for games.

    The internet just needs to get to the point where it really is everywhere as a public service before I really buy into it. Sadly we are not there yet.